From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36408
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Sender header?
Date: 25 May 2001 10:44:53 -0400
Sender: prj@multivac.cwru.edu
Message-ID: <m3g0dtfpxg.fsf@multivac.cwru.edu>
References: <vafg0dwrpyh.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May23.141128edt.115245@gateway.intersys.com>
	<vaf3d9uq4c4.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May24.115917edt.115250@gateway.intersys.com>
	<vafsnhuk8t2.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<01May24.143521edt.115214@gateway.intersys.com>
	<vafr8xejrqp.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171997 8426 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:46:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:46:37 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 15524 invoked by alias); 25 May 2001 14:44:56 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 15519 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 14:44:55 -0000
Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (261@129.22.96.25)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 May 2001 14:44:55 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 28470 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2001 14:45:16 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-To: "\(ding\)" <ding@gnus.org>
In-Reply-To: <vafr8xejrqp.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "25 May 2001 00:40:14 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7
Original-Lines: 15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36408
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36408

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes:
> Since the `after-@' part in a Message-ID should be a FQDN, I
> conclude that local.machine.example is intended to be a FQDN.
>=20
> The examples for the Sender header use machine.example, which is NOT a
> FQDN.

>>From a strict DNS point of view, both of those names are not FQ, but
both would be if you added a "." at the end.  ("gnus.org." is a FQDN;
this has nothing to do with whether it has an address.)  More relevant
to the current discussion, though, is that there is no suggestion that
Sender should include the *local* FQDN.


paul