From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/34395 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Draft buffer delete Date: 25 Jan 2001 09:28:18 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170329 30180 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:18:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A9CD049D for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:29:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAC13197; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:28:51 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:28:06 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA03918 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 08:27:57 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from multivac.cwru.edu (multivac.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu [129.22.96.25]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 61C00D049D for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:28:25 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 29600 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jan 2001 14:28:40 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org, Peter.Weiss@Class.de Original-To: Peter.Weiss@Class.de In-Reply-To: Peter.Weiss@Class.de's message of "25 Jan 2001 13:16:51 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Original-Lines: 14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34395 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:34395 Peter.Weiss@Class.de writes: > Finally I found message-sent-hook, which sounds very good, but setting > > (add-hook 'message-sent-hook '(lambda() > (kill-buffer (current-buffer)))) > > needs still interaction since the buffer is marked as modified when the > hook runs. You can use set-buffer-modified-p to mark it as unmodified before killing it. paul