From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24924 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: C-d displays duplicated parts Date: 28 Aug 1999 00:31:19 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162405 11349 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:06:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA16354 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 18:35:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAB24110; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 17:29:19 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 27 Aug 1999 17:29:54 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16276 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 17:29:44 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (bang.netfonds.no [195.1.89.231]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA16262 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 18:28:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA13511; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 00:31:32 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Adam Hochschild's _King Leopold's Ghost_ X-Now-Playing: Yellow Magic Orchestra's _XOO multiplies_: "Lotus Love" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "28 Aug 1999 00:16:57 +0200" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) Emacs/20.4 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ Oh. Yes, I understand what you're saying now. Er... You do? Could you explain it to me, then? I'm not quite sure I got it right, but François's explanation of it makes perfect sense every time I read it. :-) > I still think that the other position is defensible, but yours is, > too. So I'll just keep my mouth shut. :-) Anyway, the MIME nndoc thing is just so that one can inspect and reply to various parts of it, and the more details the better. People aren't supposed to actually use it for normal viewing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen