From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/15428 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Garbled .overviews with 5.6.11? Date: 27 Jun 1998 04:28:29 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035154461 22051 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:54:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA02543 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 20:11:27 -0700 Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA06168 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 23:08:25 -0400 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAT20412; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 21:42:07 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 26 Jun 1998 22:07:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA04349 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 22:07:49 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 6870 invoked by uid 504); 27 Jun 1998 03:07:28 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 6867 invoked from network); 27 Jun 1998 03:07:26 -0000 Original-Received: from ppp103.uio.no (HELO sparky.gnus.org) (129.240.240.108) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 1998 03:07:25 -0000 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA23147; Sat, 27 Jun 1998 05:08:09 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Mike McEwan's message of "Wed, 24 Jun 1998 19:29:06 +0100" X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.17/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > How is expiry processing supposed to work now in respect of nov > lines that do not have downloaded articles? Is it that all nov lines > with an article number less than the lowest numbered expire-able > history line (for a given group) are/should be deleted? Yes -- all NOV lines that are older than the newest expirable article and have no downloaded article are removed. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen