Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com>
Subject: Re: [POLL]: Procmail or native gnus splitting ?
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:17:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3he5o1yx4.fsf@defun.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <plop87el0xsh4q.fsf@gnu-rox.org>

Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org> writes:

> It is a consequence of the redaction of an article on 'how to get IMAP
> and Gnus play fairly together' on the Gnus French site [1]. There, I've
> been told not to talk about nnimap splitting feature because numerous
> people used to use procmail base filter to split their incoming
> mails.

I use both procmail and nnmail-split-fancy.

I normally read mail from a dial-up connection -- I don't want to
waste time and money downloading spam.  So I use procmail to send spam
to /dev/null on a permanently connected box.  I then use Gnus' native
splitting to sort my mail into different folders.

> In the same way, does procmail allows Gnus or any other MUA, to poll
> their mails directly

Yes.

> Sorry to bother but as long as nobody can show me the benefit at using
> procmail/fetmail stuff

fetchmail isn't really related to procmail.  fetchmail is a
replacement for pop3.el.  I use fetchmail because it's faster and has
more features than pop3.el.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-07-14 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-11  6:37 Xavier Maillard
2003-07-13 10:56 ` Malcolm Purvis
2003-07-13 12:03 ` Matthias Andree
2003-07-13 17:57 ` Jochen Küpper
2003-07-18 23:37   ` Kirk Strauser
2003-07-13 20:41 ` Karl Pflästerer
2003-07-13 21:37 ` Chris Halverson
2003-07-14  6:34 ` Steve Evans
2003-07-14 22:08   ` Johan Bockgård
2003-07-14  7:20 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-07-14  8:04 ` Nicolas Kowalski
2003-07-14 18:23 ` Mikael Cardell
2003-07-14 21:20 ` Danny Siu
2003-07-14 22:21 ` Henrik Enberg
2003-07-15 22:32   ` Scott Kullberg
2003-07-14 23:17 ` Jesper Harder [this message]
2003-07-14 22:51   ` Xavier Maillard
2003-07-15  7:42     ` Jochen Küpper
2003-07-15  8:02     ` Kai Großjohann
2003-07-16  9:09       ` Jochen Küpper
2003-07-15 12:08 ` Wes Hardaker
2003-07-19  0:10 ` Mats Lidell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3he5o1yx4.fsf@defun.localdomain \
    --to=harder@myrealbox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).