Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> disait récemment  :

> On Mon, Apr 07 2003, Julien Avarre wrote:
> 
> > kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (Kai Großjohann) disait récemment  :
> >
> >> Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> writes:
> >> 
> >> > What about `gnus-narrow-to-head' and `message-narrow-to-body'?
> >> 
> >> Are they needed?
> 
> I though that `message-narrow-to-body' would simplify the use of
> `latin-unity-remap-region' or `latin-unity-sanity-check' on the
> message body.  See the discussion on XEmacs+`latin-unity' in dcsg.
> 
> But as we can see, it might be useful in other places too:
> 
> > They can be usesul for the pattern [...]  Which is not very
> > practical.  Reiner's functions should help us for moving the pgg
> > pattern at the right place, am I right ?
> 
> I don't have an example for `gnus-narrow-to-head' at hand, but maybe
> it should be added for completeness.
> 
> Bye, Reiner.

Sorry, I've  probably misunderstood this thread. But  I still continue
to ask my question :-) 

Actually, I've put in my .gnus file :


   (add-hook 'message-setup-hook 'mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime)


It allows me to automatically put the pattern in my message :

                  <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>

But when I reply  to a message, this pattern is written  at the end of
quoted text.  Gnus do not interpret  it. I have to move it manually to
the beginning of the body :-(

Is there a way to avoid that, automatize this ?

Thanks'

-- 
Julien ``Eole'' Avarre
julien at avarre dot com