From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/48910 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap does not create non-existent groups on expiry (lost mail) Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 05:17:46 +0100 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1041999455 13929 80.91.224.249 (8 Jan 2003 04:17:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 04:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18W7eo-0003cP-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 05:17:34 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18W7fK-00083f-00; Tue, 07 Jan 2003 22:18:06 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 07 Jan 2003 22:19:00 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA12915 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 22:18:46 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 21189 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2003 04:17:47 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 21184 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2003 04:17:47 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 8 Jan 2003 04:17:47 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18W7ip-0007f7-00 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2003 05:21:43 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 18 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: quimbies.gnus.org Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1041999703 27484 80.91.231.2 (8 Jan 2003 04:21:43 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Jan 2003 04:21:43 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Kaia's _Ladyman_: "Off (Extended Dance Mix)" User-Agent: Gnus/5.090011 (Oort Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: 4)IzP2-FN8W$;m5z06V"L;OszknsENL>"kTs\o]R^bGCG(2lNsaQJ3wfgn)4]Wrzl5+_e^A CIUyRoCVxkpw)~QB~]XSgpdTLeh6VVj@ARhG-lZ"d/P69<6+3bD*zGX3)%F%g^~{z(2ahSkU|3'H$Y s/.sJ;bJ3;\2+51X>p5D81N?wVI36OD4;S}`$/'U%]itY:]j'9Bxe'oUW,Nw9=T674i1qmi]}?az7A|a3:Vi@xTNu1)wvSFIcLD-y3c`7$Uo_JPf=dr;eIeA(v\byCw_uAn)5; c:t(~+3Kn@/=Q Cancel-Lock: sha1:f4wQFQFbPth/MOiudmaUrTIm+x0= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48910 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:48910 Simon Josefsson writes: > I think it is more appropriate in nnmail-expiry-target-group. What do > the nnmail experts say? Perhaps we can document this so it isn't a > problem in the future: > > Is nnfoo-request-accept-article supposed to create the group if it > does not exists, or is that up to the caller? It's up to the caller. > The answer should go into the manual, I think. Now done. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen