From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/44470 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Wanted: Gnus plugin to submit spam to ordb.org Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:26:20 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <03662adav5.fsf@colargol.tihlde.org> <87pu0ijyrq.fsf@strauser.com> <87lmb6jxju.fsf@strauser.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020097737 20276 127.0.0.1 (29 Apr 2002 16:28:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 172E1J-0005Gu-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:28:57 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 172Dzc-0008Qi-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:27:12 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:27:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA25982 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:27:13 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 28159 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2002 16:26:47 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 28154 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2002 16:26:47 -0000 Original-Received: from liilmtlssm01.mailtask.com (208.203.59.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 29 Apr 2002 16:26:47 -0000 Original-Received: from LIILMTLSFE02.mailtask.com ([208.203.59.43]) by LIILMTLSSM01.mailtask.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.3779); Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:26:19 -0500 Original-Received: from onyx.nimbus.northernlight.com ([10.128.22.65]) by LIILMTLSFE02.mailtask.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:26:19 -0500 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87lmb6jxju.fsf@strauser.com> (Kirk Strauser's message of "29 Apr 2002 11:10:13 -0500") Original-Lines: 34 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Apr 2002 16:26:19.0334 (UTC) FILETIME=[97C4BE60:01C1EF9A] Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44470 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44470 On 29 Apr 2002, kirk@strauser.com wrote: > > At 2002-04-29T16:05:12Z, Ted Zlatanov > writes: > >> 2) user defines a rule in the split rules that will classify spam >> as such using the spam catching methods. For instance, the ordb >> method would do a DNS query, while the blacklist method would >> look in the user's blacklist. > > I've already installed the dnsbl features on my mailserver, as have > quite a few other people. I personally wouldn't be too interested > in having Gnus perform the checks again, although I'm certain that > others would love this. Right, so your checking method list wouldn't contain ordb, but your reporting method list would. > >> 3) user marks spam with the "H" mark, which triggers the reporting >> methods requested by the user. For instance, the ordb method >> would send mail to ORDB, while the blacklist method would add >> the sender to the user's blacklist. > > I particularly like this. Anything that makes widespread use of > anti-spam tools trivially easy for end users can only be a good > thing for all of us. My major concern (and the reason why I haven't been doing too much work on this) is that generally, in Gnus marks do not trigger actions directly. This would be a usability change that may not be welcome by the majority, even though it makes perfect sense to me personally. Thanks Ted