From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24061 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Unintended base64 encoding Date: 09 Jul 1999 20:09:09 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <874skefuuh.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161693 6661 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:54:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA23797 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:03:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAB21842; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:03:47 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 09 Jul 1999 13:04:33 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14166 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 13:03:58 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (bang.netfonds.no [195.1.89.231]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA23762 for ; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 14:02:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA11403; Fri, 9 Jul 1999 20:16:33 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Bryan Cholfin (ed.)'s _The Best of Crank!_ X-Now-Playing: Sussan Deihim & Richard Horowitz's _Desert Equations: Azax Attra_: "Ishtar" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Toby Speight's message of "09 Jul 1999 12:55:51 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070094 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.94) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Some time back (a couple of years, I think), I wrote code for TM which > inspected the message to determine the most space-efficient encoding > (if 8bit/binary weren't possible). So bodyparts containing mostly > US-ASCII printable characters got q-p encoding, and others got base64, > *irrespective of content-type*. Seems nice. I've now written the function, but what is the switchover point between qp and base64? Math genius wanted! -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen