From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23728 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: `nnmail-split-fancy' regexp Date: 04 Jul 1999 05:07:48 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161409 3590 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:50:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA13826 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 23:10:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAB21985; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 22:09:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 03 Jul 1999 22:10:19 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA15297 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 22:10:08 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (bang.netfonds.no [195.1.89.231]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA13774 for ; Sat, 3 Jul 1999 23:07:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA04230; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 05:18:09 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Marion Zimmer Bradley's _The Shadow Matrix_ X-Now-Playing: New Music's _Warp_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Alexandre Oliva's message of "28 Jun 1999 16:11:28 -0300" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070091 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.91) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > So, even though `.*' appears to be much more intuitive, it is not > really that intuitive if you don't happen to know what's going on > behind the scenes, so I'd rather have a prefix that is clearly not > part of the regexp. It might have been better to use a (cons 'partial > "regex") to denote partial matches... Yes, that sounds like a better idea than a "magic" prefix. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen