From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23575 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Harry Putnam Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: some mail annoyances Date: 25 Jun 1999 19:46:32 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4yn1xp7ytu.fsf@sgichr.fastweb.no> <14195.59371.224963.121057@ralf.serv.net> <14196.6568.178842.849769@ralf.serv.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161283 2777 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:48:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA04608 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:47:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAB11302; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:47:10 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:47:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA11849 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:47:43 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mail.networkone.net (qmailr@mail.networkone.net [209.144.112.75]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA04566 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 22:46:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 13678 invoked from network); 26 Jun 1999 02:46:54 -0000 Original-Received: from pm3-6-42.la.networkone.net (HELO satellite.local.lan) (reader@209.144.125.106) by mail.networkone.net with SMTP; 26 Jun 1999 02:46:54 -0000 Original-Received: (from reader@localhost) by satellite.local.lan (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA01146; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 19:46:33 -0700 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Stainless Steel Rat's message of "25 Jun 1999 22:28:49 -0400" Original-Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070083 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.83) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23575 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:23575 Stainless Steel Rat writes: > * Harry Putnam on Fri, 25 Jun 1999 > | Just my own habits, but I find myself wanting to keep more than half > | of my mail so ticking would be more time consuming than marking the > | ones I don't want with "E". > > You are obviously not on moderate to high volume mailing lists :). Maybe not, but Redhat lists, or "ding" for that matter, are not considered "quiet" by most. > > Of course, if you unmark all your ticked/dormant articles then catch up, > those articles are ripe for expiry. About all I can say to that is, "don't > do that." Maybe you have a good reason for it, but I generally do not see > the rational behind unmarking an entire group. You must have noticed at one time or another that M-c is rather close to M-x. > Then again, rsync is my friend. It should be your's, too. I did recently start tinkering with rsync, and just in the last few day have written and implemented an elementary backup script using "tar" for $HOME and /etc., so may get a little braver with total expire.