From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18578 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME composition (was: Storing the group a message has been written to) Date: 13 Nov 1998 23:56:34 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157078 6892 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:37:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA29555 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 18:01:04 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAB09838; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:00:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:00:40 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA05602 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:00:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp034.uio.no [129.240.240.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA29533 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 18:00:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA15556; Sat, 14 Nov 1998 00:03:56 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Janet Frame's _The Carpathians_ X-Now-Playing: Eurythmics's _Sweet Dreams (Are Made Of This)_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "13 Nov 1998 23:47:12 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070043 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.43) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ Can you meaningfully use several buffers? You could have articles > (no, just files) named "42.2.3" in nndraft:drafts... Yes, that would be a possibility. However, it does make things more complex (what one file gets deleted or something?), so if keeping it all in one buffer is feasible, I'd prefer that, I think. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen