From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16382 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Functional requirements for Gnus Date: 29 Aug 1998 13:18:43 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155264 27448 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:07:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA25033 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 07:33:01 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAF12481; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 06:02:39 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 29 Aug 1998 06:31:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA10422 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 06:31:11 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp074.uio.no [129.240.240.79]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA25004 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 07:31:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA25265; Sat, 29 Aug 1998 13:32:45 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Jack Dann (ed.)'s _Nova Awards 32_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of "28 Aug 1998 18:26:30 +0200" X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.42/XEmacs 21.0 - "Finnish Landrace" X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > I did not mean `before presentation'. I meant that you get three > windows for MIME messages: the summary buffer, the toc buffer, and the > article buffer. The TOC buffer contains the information shown above. I think adding a third buffer might be a bit awkward -- if the user wants that fine-grained traversal of the MIME article, then the nndoc alternative would be the one to use. (`C-d' some multipart articles and have a peek at how it looks. I find that very useful when applying patches encoded in multipart messages, for instance.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen