From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/14341 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: feedback on AUTHINFO in qgnus-0.27 Date: 28 Feb 1998 06:48:53 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <199802231806.NAA23998@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035153548 14347 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:39:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA05904 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 22:20:07 -0800 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA08956 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:15:55 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAH28989; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:15:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:14:26 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA28891 for ; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:13:55 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 25019 invoked by uid 504); 28 Feb 1998 06:13:46 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 24998 invoked from network); 28 Feb 1998 06:13:44 -0000 Original-Received: from xyplex40.uio.no (HELO sparky.gnus.org) (129.240.154.60) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 1998 06:13:43 -0000 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA02050; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 07:18:29 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Jason R Mastaler's message of "27 Feb 1998 21:27:29 -0700" X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.33/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Because users are often careless, and their careless actions can > result in dire consequences. Yes... > It's more of a courtesy and security safegaurd than a censor. > > Think of it another way. When would anyone ever _not_ want > permissions of 600 on a plaintext file containing passwords? Well, I can't think of why anyone would leave the home directory world writable, but I'm certainly not going to check whether the user has done so or not. Etc. But that's something that rarely happens, while many users do leave .rhosts (etc.) world readable by mistake, so it is (perhaps) reasonable to warn them about what they have done. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen