From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11683 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Hedbor Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Scoring + expunge & threading Date: 16 Jul 1997 17:22:55 -0700 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151351 31821 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:02:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA00479 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 1997 18:05:14 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA05052 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 1997 20:02:00 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 17 Jul 1997 02:23:39 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 11437 invoked by uid 504); 17 Jul 1997 00:23:38 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 11434 invoked from network); 17 Jul 1997 00:23:37 -0000 Original-Received: from animal.blarg.net (mail@206.114.144.1) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 1997 00:23:36 -0000 Original-Received: from mouser.hedbor.org (neotron@c20-camilla.blarg.net [206.114.159.149]) by animal.blarg.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA25690 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 1997 17:23:34 -0700 Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Homepage: http://david.hedbor.org/ X-Face: 3su_O5R!|})4gc|&nXdVILe~2hIncsaJF_TC>rnR NA0Aj-u\*nln*:ktY!d+[%K()Q|1*-U [+xczKd$Xev:F#3'rFgot\l.I+w>DQ%:%HOyZ]EgFw@0[gMFsR-E`Hs~tjkc>y.i#y<55R_CScR X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.63/Emacs 19.34 Original-Lines: 19 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:2073 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11683 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11683 I have started entering groups with thousands of messages, and use extensive filtering in them, usually leaving less than 50 messages. I have noticed that it possibly works like this: 1) Scoring 2) Threading 3) Expunging 4) Making summary Wouldn't it be better if 3 and 2 changed place, so you don't have to thread messages you won't see anyway? I might have this wrong, as the threading-part might include the expunging as well. Can anyone clarify this? -- Ask five economists and you'll get five different explanations (six if one went to Harvard). -- Edgar R. Fiedler