From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/72813 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: mm-default-directory not honoured Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:02:07 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286632969 19872 80.91.229.12 (9 Oct 2010 14:02:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:02:49 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M21185@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Oct 09 16:02:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4a0d-0006uQ-Q2 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:02:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4a0F-0004Po-KY; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:02:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P4a0E-0004PX-33 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:02:22 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4a07-0004sR-T1 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:02:19 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1P4a07-0007SP-00 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:02:15 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4a06-0006iE-Tp for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:02:14 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:02:14 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 16:02:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAG1BMVEWipJgSDxSCf4UzOUrB v7Sin5L+//KvqJz09ebDY79HAAACIElEQVQ4jW2UwW/TMBTGTaEqxxlL47o63X3OmzaOoFppjmUo 8pWtUdRjELHMGVCVP5vvOU7Wlj6pVeKfv++959gW1UkEPz6JM1BVi3AE+H1UhARcwIsPzKqnp6q6 dcJPwLUhhG0IzsNn3oYRTOFaxxxm80rEEVa0brFtFz5OhLEIXX8hKi9C2ZzFAT+vRfg1DvRl3+/7 /sAAybvuXMHByaH4a61NjvveWkiQ3EHBHbkB1FrrIlqx4n8QIvhJkgjge0aI/BV8lWQkwIuRiA/H 4PabOQVDjjdwUm6vM5MDKKIilbuTII81/kjGKJJiR5jGIJ+AR+cACuYf62kcgJOXUBAZAMrgyVkO qSoIYwdkBsGnsdzG2h88niVSQDEXLi77F0UsyiOBlY8KfIS1UrQkeUfJ6rUPqfKllFcZJIo792z1 zN2SMUaqNXHrY+fPUhuFxEpKzV40dI4+FCmuVWUy1qWioiubmmtVyPI2tkjmofFx+9Qyrp/SMyww HuV1LJcBRZCvrF1qaK+bNoJ9xlVJ0qvPEBklH9IiNr9pCC1muab4aUNcqz/xu+Va32iddskAdtLw /EzrmRDvGGx8UrCAXfRsZU+teGkpu0GLcV9tBlBfPd7fs9lsaU5AU5ZlsUZau0470W4GsJ/2f9q7 ULj3l84Hkm9xBg+XgOts6Dp7Flwujrt3LixwxhdHZx4XQOX44IS5D8d3wdHt4/yAMA23wD/Wc1p0 Uq/U1AAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Thomas Dolby's _The Flat Earth_ User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MQcout5vcp3tlpx8YIJwHdWZv+w= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:72813 Archived-At: Adrian Lanz writes: > I keep all attachments in a single directory: for me, it is a quick and > dirty export of the files while going throug my new mail. BTW a new > feature for the wishlist: I would even like, I think, Gnus providing an > (optional) mechanism, which would automatically extract mail attachments > (by type?) from all new mail messages (incoming mails or, better, while > reading an unread message?). `X m' does that, I think. > Afterwards I filter (copy/move) documents (attachments) by hand into > thematic directories (projects). Of course, one could imagine a > splitting of mail attachments into directories the Gnus (magic) way, > like it's done with mail messages (based on mail headers). But this > might be a little bit exagerated? Any need for that? (I vote for it, > without high priority.) It sounds like it would make sense in some use cases, but I think this probably wouldn't be used much. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen