From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: ding@gnus.org
Subject: Re: nnimap issues
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:17:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3iq1sbhtf.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878w2olqoa.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> writes:
> The 'UID FETCH 1:*' command is an O(n) operation (both in terms of
> computation on client and server side but also on bandwidth) on the size
> of the mailbox, and for large mailboxes this becomes really painful. It
> can results in MB's of data being pushed every time I press 'g'.
It only requests the last 100 flags...
> The old nnimap used the STATUS command to look for new mail instead.
> There are controversies over whether this is a good idea or not, but
> older IMAP RFCs support it and as far as I know, it is the fastest and
> most reliable way to check for new mail. Alternatively, doing a 'UID
> FETCH 1,*' should be an O(1) operation.
>
> Generally, why is it downloading all the flags on all messages over and
> over again? It should have all that cached anyway, except for possibly
> new messages.
Before starting working on this, I was trolling the gnus-bug group, and
it seemed like the most constant complaint was "why is nnimap showing 30
unread messages while there's really only 2"? I think the only way to
actually tell how many new messages have actually arrived when UIDNEXT
jumps from X to X+N is to do a UID FETCH X:*, isn't it? (Please correct
me if I'm mistaken -- I'm not an IMAP expert).
So Gnus requests (- X 100):*, to just double-check whether any of the
most recent messages have changed their flags, too.
So the primary reason for the flag fetch isn't really to get the flags
(although that's a nice side-effect), but to find out how many new
articles there are in the mail box.
If there's a faster way to do this, I'd love to hear it.
(Oh, there's QRESYNC, which might speed stuff up, but I haven't
implemented that yet.)
> 2) Nnimap no longer auto-discover that my server supports STARTTLS and
> instead tried to use direct TLS, which obviously fails since my IMAP
> server doesn't speak native TLS on the vanilla IMAP port. I had to add
> 'nnimap-stream starttls' to my select method manually. STARTTLS is the
> recommended way to do TLS with IMAP so it would be nice to make this
> work automatically.
Yes, it should check the capabilites and auto-STARTTLS if it's
available, I guess?
> 3) When imap-log is non-nil, the *imap-log* buffer no longer contains
> the output from the server, which makes debugging harder.
I was planning on getting rid of the log buffer totally when it works
perfectly. Any day now! :-)
> 4) Nnimap mail splitting is not working any more. All my e-mail sits in
> INBOX and there is no filtering going on. I don't see anything in
> GNUS-NEWS about any change in this area, so it must be a bug. :-)
:-) I've now added a mention, but it's mostly related to the new
nnimap-inbox variable, and using the standard nnmail-split-methods.
>
> 5) Selecting a IMAP group results in two SELECT operations? From
> *imap-log*:
>
> 09:34:53 2012 SELECT "INBOX.yxa-staff"
> 09:34:54 2013 SELECT "INBOX.yxa-staff"
That looks like a bug. I'll fix it...
> 6) Deleting messages doesn't compress the article list, which for large
> operations may result in too long lines:
>
> 09:35:05 2016 UID STORE 6309,6310,6311,6312,6313,6314,6315 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Deleted)
> 09:35:06 2017 UID EXPUNGE 6309,6310,6311,6312,6313,6314,6315
> 09:35:08 2018 UID STORE 6309:6315 +FLAGS.SILENT (\Seen)
Yup; fixed.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-26 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-26 10:55 Simon Josefsson
2010-09-26 16:17 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen [this message]
2010-09-26 17:08 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-26 18:33 ` Steinar Bang
2010-09-26 18:40 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-26 23:44 ` Daniel Pittman
2010-09-26 17:49 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-27 14:26 ` Simon Josefsson
2010-09-27 16:56 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-27 14:39 ` Simon Josefsson
2010-09-27 17:20 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-09-27 17:25 ` Steinar Bang
2010-09-27 17:39 ` Julien Danjou
2010-09-27 21:17 ` Frank Schmitt
2010-09-28 8:08 ` Steinar Bang
2010-09-28 8:35 ` David Engster
2010-09-28 13:00 ` Steinar Bang
2010-09-29 15:06 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-12 6:45 ` Steinar Bang
2010-10-12 12:44 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3iq1sbhtf.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=ding@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).