From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70362 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Faster, lolcat. Faster! Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:17:28 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87aao05t55.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283437217 30444 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2010 14:20:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 14:20:17 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M18746@lists.math.uh.edu Thu Sep 02 16:20:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrAeF-0000kn-Uj for ding-account@gmane.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:20:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OrAeD-0000ia-9G; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OrAeC-0000iI-29 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OrAe4-0000e2-KT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:20:11 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OrAe3-0005xU-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:20:03 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OrAe3-0000c8-T3 for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:20:03 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:20:03 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:20:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEXVrahOLi0XCgoRBQai WlJ4UU/GbmNPPSDUAAACb0lEQVQ4jV2TzXbjIAyFWTReFxyyR8SzN7xA0wOsQ8by2ulxeP9HmCs7 7clU/gnms650IVbM1eI0PpBLLDElCcXV22qrjyaG4yvQ1XAlH4OJY9WWp5xKawDOau4DhehjJD/g /TUty4oMrWugiDNG52gTW5RKSgqwCUYSDIYTQFGqobg29oYicfR+0FNmzmltDRlktOhIONTmqaQG MJgw5NsTBDvt7QL0o3Ga0FU4fsZ43JTSBBAJllEhjjb5aCu0yg6CJvsXKuZ4MV471pyaSIXg3GTI kz9/BR/Gi648w7ty3jljKF2i+/Te0NGQPa+lKe2Dxvh0gz/XB8d5oKGckqo3o+1qTihD5x7VNeyX mhRei/HsyicRDT6y8Y5syZOKzkSaLwXzkfr4gFcaZunK9HG8cLkJqbY1E8LA4kOC3J87gCa0w+Sw LOJc1ojmley0Fv4OcS7g2NoFwg/ZclxZMkDG9mhbCEhZtgoG49hb5rmtOJoMhKI4lkZjNJc16fIK bK0AMLvy2BpkZp6m1BZV5Z+ICy8OACWDQXNRvCkhOXOmeeZVyguYvhvP05d30tHcNmDzE6wN6wgb H62VDXxntEclOjWeO3H0CoD0SczsYHgBiPT8VWq4qoOs0HNi/sm44thaae1e2mN6pGcG4oCcDTgt +5/r1hWClwOvS7ujXU9ksz6WTUqt1zdeVWdoAwiH7VHI6T7Um9oBhSD3QYpc8VmpDMU7bZNbJIB3 KdNJD/ucj3Kf8fyh9jiQ9z8pDhMaX+mh65YDvYYSd1fBSf0C2EOIdW+X7F+kSP2Esb8yun1d1O19 9xf+y4DB29WEF6l/btUBDCbRZUgAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Nadja's _Skin Turns to Glass_: "Skin Turns to Glass" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:A4++Mqx/AfEHxHuRUjd5OJG2fVg= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70362 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > Another performance issue I've noticed is that N foreign groups on the > same server (subscribed through the server buffer and without an > explicitly configured server entry) seem to always be slower than N > groups on an explicitly configured (primary or secondary) server. Gnus should gather all groups from the different servers, whether they're foreign or not, first, and then do the right thing on them. That would make the foreign/secondary distinction almost disappear. > In the "too slow to be done properly" category are the unread/unseen > nnimap counts which as you know are usually inaccurate. We've had > patches over the years but I don't think anyone has actually solved the > problem. And I've never used imap. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen