From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49429 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthias Andree Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: List-Post vs. Mail-Followup-To. Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:08:29 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043150861 1148 80.91.224.249 (21 Jan 2003 12:07:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18axBr-0000IG-00 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:07:40 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18axCz-0006TT-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 06:08:49 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 21 Jan 2003 06:09:44 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA26245 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 06:09:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 75868 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2003 12:08:34 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 75863 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 12:08:34 -0000 Original-Received: from pd9e1efc9.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO m2a2.dyndns.org) (postfix@217.225.239.201) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 21 Jan 2003 12:08:34 -0000 Original-Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 00CB67AC3E; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:08:29 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 21 Jan 2003 07:10:05 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090013 (Oort Gnus v0.13) Emacs/21.2 (i586-suse-linux) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49429 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49429 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Matthias Andree writes: > >> there have been complaints on the bogofilter mailing list about my >> sending Cc:'s for list replies (I've been using F for >> Followup-and-quote). > > If people don't want that, they should be using Mail-Followup-To. Tell that Eudora users (who meddle with threading all the time with their broken References: headers). >> I would have expected that List-Post has the same status as >> Mail-Followup-To in mailing lists. > > The two headers have orthogonal functionality. Are there any standardization efforts for Mail-Followup-To: and friends? Those "Reply-To mungers" always pull back on this "it's not RFC, we don't care, don't use elm and let us munge Reply-To" issue. -- Matthias Andree