* nnfoo-save-mail, nnfoo-active-number
@ 2001-07-11 16:24 Paul Jarc
2001-07-12 17:13 ` ShengHuo ZHU
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jarc @ 2001-07-11 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
I'm working on getting nnmaildir to accept split mail. What kind of
group names are passed to -save-mail and -active-number? Plain, or
prefixed? Or (ugh) plain for the primary server, and prefixed
otherwise?
Also, is the result of -active-number examined by any part of Gnus or
nnmail, or is it just passed back to -save-mail? In this case,
-save-mail is recalculating the number anyway, so I wonder if I can
get away with always returning nil (or 1 or whatever) for
-active-number.
paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: nnfoo-save-mail, nnfoo-active-number
2001-07-11 16:24 nnfoo-save-mail, nnfoo-active-number Paul Jarc
@ 2001-07-12 17:13 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2001-07-12 22:19 ` Paul Jarc
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: ShengHuo ZHU @ 2001-07-12 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:
> I'm working on getting nnmaildir to accept split mail. What kind of
> group names are passed to -save-mail and -active-number? Plain, or
> prefixed? Or (ugh) plain for the primary server, and prefixed
> otherwise?
>
> Also, is the result of -active-number examined by any part of Gnus or
> nnmail, or is it just passed back to -save-mail? In this case,
> -save-mail is recalculating the number anyway, so I wonder if I can
> get away with always returning nil (or 1 or whatever) for
> -active-number.
-save-mail and -active-number are not deffoo functions, therefore, for
nnmaildir you don't have to implement them unless the backend itself
wants to use them.
ShengHuo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: nnfoo-save-mail, nnfoo-active-number
2001-07-12 17:13 ` ShengHuo ZHU
@ 2001-07-12 22:19 ` Paul Jarc
2001-07-24 22:54 ` ShengHuo ZHU
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Jarc @ 2001-07-12 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu> writes:
> -save-mail and -active-number are not deffoo functions, therefore, for
> nnmaildir you don't have to implement them unless the backend itself
> wants to use them.
I know they're not part of the Gnus<->backends interface, but they are
part of the nnmail<->mail backends interface. Without them, you can't
split mail into an nnmaildir group (AFAICT).
paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: nnfoo-save-mail, nnfoo-active-number
2001-07-12 22:19 ` Paul Jarc
@ 2001-07-24 22:54 ` ShengHuo ZHU
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ShengHuo ZHU @ 2001-07-24 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes:
> ShengHuo ZHU <zsh@cs.rochester.edu> writes:
>> -save-mail and -active-number are not deffoo functions, therefore, for
>> nnmaildir you don't have to implement them unless the backend itself
>> wants to use them.
>
> I know they're not part of the Gnus<->backends interface, but they are
> part of the nnmail<->mail backends interface. Without them, you can't
> split mail into an nnmaildir group (AFAICT).
I missed this factor.
In the backend functions, group names are plain names in most cases,
including -save-mail and -active-number. I think that a fake
active-number is safe if your -save-mail knows that.
ShengHuo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-24 22:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-07-11 16:24 nnfoo-save-mail, nnfoo-active-number Paul Jarc
2001-07-12 17:13 ` ShengHuo ZHU
2001-07-12 22:19 ` Paul Jarc
2001-07-24 22:54 ` ShengHuo ZHU
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).