From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36894 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnfoo-save-mail, nnfoo-active-number Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:19:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <2ny9pujcjx.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035172403 10994 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:53:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 12115 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2001 22:19:53 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (261@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 12 Jul 2001 22:19:53 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 12669 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2001 22:20:12 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <2ny9pujcjx.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet> (ShengHuo ZHU's message of "Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:13:22 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 11 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36894 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36894 ShengHuo ZHU writes: > -save-mail and -active-number are not deffoo functions, therefore, for > nnmaildir you don't have to implement them unless the backend itself > wants to use them. I know they're not part of the Gnus<->backends interface, but they are part of the nnmail<->mail backends interface. Without them, you can't split mail into an nnmaildir group (AFAICT). paul