From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35068 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: `user-mail-address' for message-ids Date: 27 Feb 2001 20:15:28 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <20010223133030.B14991@mastaler.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035170871 1028 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:27:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8DBD049D for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:16:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAB23299; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:15:49 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:15:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA17472 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 19:14:57 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from multivac.cwru.edu (multivac.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu [129.22.96.25]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A044D049D for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 20:15:29 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (qmail 32177 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2001 01:15:50 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: ("Jason R. Mastaler"'s message of "27 Feb 2001 18:06:48 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Original-Lines: 22 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35068 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35068 "Jason R. Mastaler" writes: > prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes: > > > We already established that different gnus users @hotmail.com > > > won't be clashing. > > > > How so? > > These are your own words Paul: > > "We can ensure that the LHS would be unique if everyone used the same > algorithm, but we can't make everyone use the same algorithm." > > Gnus users share the same algorithm which ensures that the LHS is > unique which means they won't be clashing. Note that I didn't say what it would take to provide that guarantee. You'd have to encode the FQDN on the LHS, I think; your suggestion didn't include that, so I can't see how your suggestion provides uniqueness. paul