From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/23836 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [PATCH for 0.91] (Was: Still having mail problems with version 0.88) Date: 05 Jul 1999 06:50:30 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87g134jejy.fsf@pc-hrvoje.srce.hr> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035161497 4178 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:51:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA03537 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 00:42:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAB00917; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 23:42:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 04 Jul 1999 23:42:50 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA00269 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 1999 23:42:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (bang.netfonds.no [195.1.89.231]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA03508 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 00:41:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA06492; Mon, 5 Jul 1999 06:52:23 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Maureen F. McHugh's _China Mountain Zhang_ X-Now-Playing: Eurythmics's _Sweet Dreams (Are Made Of This)_: "This Is The House" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Lloyd Zusman's message of "04 Jul 1999 18:41:57 -0400" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070092 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.92) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > The fact that it returned nil is indeed what broke my code, but I'm > wondering if this is proper. I'm wondering if perhaps the fact that > it returned nil is actually a symptom of a deeper problem. The function should never return nil, and if it does, the bug is in the function that returns nil. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen