From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19107 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: PATCH for mm-util.el Date: 24 Nov 1998 11:21:10 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <283e79onov.fsf@kchisa.ga.sony.co.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157517 9878 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:45:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA24572 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 05:16:58 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAB02662; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:16:44 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:16:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA28577 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 04:15:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp093.uio.no [129.240.240.98]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA24512 for ; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 05:15:32 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA30037; Tue, 24 Nov 1998 11:23:36 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Paul Auster's _Translations_ X-Now-Playing: Stereolab's _Dots and Loops_: "Contronatura" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Katsumi Yamaoka's message of "24 Nov 1998 10:59:44 +0900" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070054 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.54) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > It seems that coding systems and MIME charsets are confused in > mm-decode-coding-* and mm-encode-coding-*. I don't see quite what's confusing if I've understood things correctly, which I probably haven't. :-) A MULE "coding system" is the same thing as a MIME "charset". Isn't it? If not, I can understand the confusion. (Well, to be totally precise, MULE "coding systems" are a superset of MIME "charsets", since you may consider, say, gzip to be a coding system, but then you have to decode coding systems more than once, which is something the MULE in Emacs 20.3 isn't well-disposed to doing, so in practice they are the same.) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen