From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18822 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: broken MIME parse? also, another MIME error thrown Date: 18 Nov 1998 02:09:47 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157282 8321 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:41:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA27162 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 20:10:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAB27645; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 19:10:36 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 17 Nov 1998 19:10:20 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA22504 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 19:09:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp110.uio.no [129.240.240.115]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA27045 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 1998 20:09:23 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA12543; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 02:14:55 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Elizabeth Hand's _Waking the Moon_ X-Now-Playing: The Clash's _Sandinista!_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Karl Kleinpaste's message of "17 Nov 1998 17:32:01 -0500" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070049 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.49) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Signaling: (wrong-type-argument integer-or-marker-p nil) > gnus-mime-display-alternative(nil nil (#) 1) Yup. Fix in Pterodactyl Gnus v0.49. > Disregarding the error thrown, is this proper behavior in the MIME > context, that the entire content be left unrendered in the absence of > boundaries? Hm. Well, the RFCs says that the part before the first separator is to be ignored, but when there is no first separator, I guess we can do whatever we want. I've made 0.49 display the entire text in this situation. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen