From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/78428 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: James Cloos Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: [CORRECTED] Re: An example of an nnimap group where the Group count is always wrong Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 19:27:34 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302305752 12473 80.91.229.12 (8 Apr 2011 23:35:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 23:35:52 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M26731@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Apr 09 01:35:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q8LDN-0003Rr-VT for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 01:35:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q8LCT-0007aE-Qs; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:34:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q8LCR-0007a0-8x for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:34:47 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q8LCQ-0001ZE-Bs for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:34:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eagle.jhcloos.com ([207.210.242.212]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q8LCM-00023X-EN for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 01:34:42 +0200 Original-Received: by eagle.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 42B4840100; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 23:34:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=eagle; t=1302305680; bh=kTFEWpy4Z6HBy2cvHN1UDY1OivewEHILmPO5AXrK7T8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sf5P1IizuQH5Z13rE3RUm2z8EbWeM16710UV8SK6bFwcUe5jov5qtdn+wiAO1vLiZ 72/RM2hV+eKAw/+XqhQQdp6mA3S1WYcLJbZKtJGUEvZRx7/OernnUQ4AnCYzLO/4km gZwyj78GaUJ7Sh0kdmzsePt7RF0Kr0IJNEUHv1i4= Original-Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 67F46260042; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 23:27:34 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (James Cloos's message of "Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:14:54 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC Copyright: Copyright 2011 James Cloos OpenPGP: ED7DAEA6; url=http://jhcloos.com/public_key/0xED7DAEA6.asc OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 Original-Lines: 22 X-Hashcash: 1:30:110408:ding@gnus.org::D2ghqjUwVIhBCU0T:000XWgW2 X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:78428 Archived-At: [SIGH] Why is it that it takes sending out a message to figure out a bug? It seems that when I updated my patch set for dbmail (which initially targetted uids-per-group) to make imap LIST efficient, I lost one line of the original patch set dealing with UIDNEXT. With that one-line patch reinstated, my Group buffer is correct again. I wish I had noticed the inaccurate uidnext value in the last email before hitting C-c C-c.... [SIGH] -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6