From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55409 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Cache passwords Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:12:54 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87vfoa5she.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> <87isjxlrxh.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1072833406 5314 80.91.224.253 (31 Dec 2003 01:16:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3949@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Dec 31 02:16:43 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AbUyZ-0001ye-00 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:16:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AbUyL-0001s1-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:16:29 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AbUyE-0001rv-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:16:22 -0600 Original-Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk (pfepc.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.237]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1553A005A for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 19:16:21 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from [195.249.83.79] (0xc3f9534f.esnxr2.ras.tele.dk [195.249.83.79]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E32F262961 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:16:14 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <87isjxlrxh.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> (Jeremy Maitin-Shepard's message of "Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:03:22 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1004 (Gnus v5.10.4) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55409 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55409 Jeremy Maitin-Shepard writes: > Given that garbage collection is used, and the high-level nature of > emacs lisp, I that there is good reason to believe that regardless of > any amount of effort, the password might remain somewhere in memory for > a while. I do believe that explicitly overwriting a string, e.g. with `clear-string', *will* change the bits immediately. But it's less obvious what the effect of `clrhash' is, as Simon notes.