From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/44797 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Fallback for nnmail-split-methods Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 14:55:38 -0400 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021143182 18975 127.0.0.1 (11 May 2002 18:53:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 18:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 176bzJ-0004va-00 for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 20:53:02 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 176byW-0005Xk-00; Sat, 11 May 2002 13:52:12 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 11 May 2002 13:52:29 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA26140 for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 13:52:18 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 16078 invoked by alias); 11 May 2002 18:51:57 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 16072 invoked from network); 11 May 2002 18:51:57 -0000 Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (HELO multivac.cwru.edu) (qmailr@129.22.96.25) by gnus.org with SMTP; 11 May 2002 18:51:57 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 17627 invoked by uid 500); 11 May 2002 18:56:01 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Wed, 08 May 2002 13:36:04 +0200") Mail-Copies-To: nobody Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44797 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44797 Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) wrote: > Thomas.Gehrlein@t-online.de (Thomas Gehrlein) writes: >> nnmail-split-fancy has a fallback option for mails that don't match >> any of the splitting rules. nnmail-split-methods doesnt't provide >> a fallback. I discovered this after some of my mails had >> disappeared. > > It appears that there is now some code which is supposed to do this: > the last group mentioned in nnmail-split-methods is used as the > fallback. Wouldn't it be less surprising and more reliable to use a constant fallback "bogus", just like nnmail-split-fancy? paul