From: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>
Subject: Re: off topic alert: XEmacs vs Emacs?
Date: 20 Jul 1999 19:39:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3k8ru51rp.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Kai Großjohann's message of "20 Jul 1999 23:34:10 +0200"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* Kai Großjohann <Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE> on Tue, 20 Jul 1999
| When people ask about the pros and cons of each version, it is easy to
| come up with nifty XEmacs features like toolbar buttons, the Motif
| scroll bars, tooltips, inline images, the many preconfigured add-on
| packages, and stuff.
None of which I use; in fact, I compile XEmacs without any of them. I
switched to XEmacs specifically because I can build it without the
"features" for which I have no use.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v0.9.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE3lQjKgl+vIlSVSNkRAiSpAKD95tCQOTU/9kg0XuAcMNDFCoNEhQCg1/N3
1EpokCPnhdR40upfj6Xy35g=
=Cggb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> \ Ingredients of Happy Fun Ball include an
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ unknown glowing substance which fell to
PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ Earth, presumably from outer space.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-07-20 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-07-20 21:34 Kai Großjohann
1999-07-20 23:39 ` Stainless Steel Rat [this message]
1999-07-21 4:09 ` \201s in Gnus buffers (Re: off topic alert: XEmacs vs Emacs?) Karl Eichwalder
1999-07-21 10:06 ` Kai Großjohann
1999-07-21 19:19 ` Karl Eichwalder
1999-07-22 11:01 ` Kai Großjohann
1999-07-22 20:04 ` Karl Eichwalder
1999-07-23 5:03 ` Neil Crellin
1999-08-27 21:14 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-07-21 11:00 ` off topic alert: XEmacs vs Emacs? Hrvoje Niksic
1999-07-21 12:10 ` Jan Vroonhof
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3k8ru51rp.fsf@peorth.gweep.net \
--to=ratinox@peorth.gweep.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).