From: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net>
Subject: Re: Those `mailcrypt' "push OK" boxes
Date: 25 Apr 1999 22:18:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3k8v0t991.fsf@peorth.gweep.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: François Pinard's message of "25 Apr 1999 21:46:02 -0400"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* François Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca> on Sun, 25 Apr 1999
| Most error messages in Emacs do not require confirmation.
None of mailcrypt's messages require confirmation. The reason for the 'OK'
buttons is because of the nature of dialog boxes, not because of any of
mailcrypt's requirements.
| So, if I interpret your answer, you are saying that you have no required
| confirmation that you read the error message?
Like I said: just like any other error message in Emacs. If mailcrypt
fails, it is because the underlying PGP or GPG process failed. Mailcrypt
tells you that -- and the buffer being worked on will be obvious in its
lack of being processed.
| It might then disappear at the next random keystroke.
Whoopie. Fact is, if mailcrypt fails to encrypt or decrypt a buffer, it is
so obvious that no 'random keystrokes' will make any difference. If that
were not the case, if the failure were subtle or inobvious, sure, I agree
that acknowledgement of some sort would be a Good Thing. But not for this,
especially when n-1 times out of n (where n is a large number) it is
nothing more than an obnoxious inconveniece for the sake of the 1 time out
of n the human drops something on the keyboard or fat-fingers or the like.
I suggest trying an Emacs built without dialog boxes and see for yourself.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v0.9.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE3I8zqgl+vIlSVSNkRAknpAJ92D11sgvkmH7gIUSnh82becldY+QCgmL/1
Kb+hwLnGHiauQFNkZjzYtzk=
=9ZjT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Rat <ratinox@peorth.gweep.net> \ Warning: pregnant women, the elderly, and
Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ children under 10 should avoid prolonged
PGP Key: at a key server near you! \ exposure to Happy Fun Ball.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-26 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-24 3:34 François Pinard
1999-04-24 15:36 ` Gareth Jones
1999-04-24 16:43 ` François Pinard
1999-04-25 14:08 ` Stainless Steel Rat
1999-04-25 16:27 ` François Pinard
1999-04-25 21:42 ` Stainless Steel Rat
1999-04-25 22:30 ` François Pinard
1999-04-26 1:19 ` Stainless Steel Rat
1999-04-26 1:46 ` François Pinard
1999-04-26 2:18 ` Stainless Steel Rat [this message]
1999-04-26 4:23 ` François Pinard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3k8v0t991.fsf@peorth.gweep.net \
--to=ratinox@peorth.gweep.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).