From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18577 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME composition (was: Storing the group a message has been written to) Date: 13 Nov 1998 23:50:58 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157077 6884 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:37:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA29283 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:50:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB09553; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 16:50:43 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 13 Nov 1998 16:50:39 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA05435 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 16:50:28 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp080.uio.no [129.240.240.85]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA29260 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:50:16 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA15307; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 23:53:51 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Ursula K. Le Guin & Virginia Kidd (ed.)'s _Interfaces_ X-Now-Playing: Eurythmics's _Sweet Dreams (Are Made Of This)_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "13 Nov 1998 23:08:09 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070043 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.43) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ That's a great way to remove a bug and add a feature :-) How about > gnus-command-group, to go with gnus-command-method? Well, it should probably be something like `nnmail-split-list' or something. > And a question: I did a bit of tracing, and apparently, GROUP-ART > always contains exactly one cons cell when nnmail-cache-insert is > called. (Well it did in all of the two cases I looked at...) So I > just use the first one in the list. I think it can be a list of cons cells if the mail is crossposted between groups. But I kinda think we should hold off doing work in this area until after the rewrite. The group-art concept may go away completely -- it's hard to say in advance... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen