From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18493 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vladimir Volovich Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: resending & empty subjects Date: 10 Nov 1998 21:33:04 +0300 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157007 6417 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:36:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA05913 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 14:32:49 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAB12160; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 13:32:37 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 10 Nov 1998 13:32:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA19664 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 13:32:21 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from cc.vsu.ru (root@ns.vsu.relarn.ru [194.226.24.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA05899 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 14:31:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cc.vsu.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with UUCP id WAA25237 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 22:30:23 +0300 Original-Received: (from vvv@localhost) by vvv.vsu.ru (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA30520; Tue, 10 Nov 1998 21:33:04 +0300 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070036 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.36) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18493 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:18493 Hi, when resending a message with empty subject, gnus asks me to enter the subject, which seems a bit wrong. Also, while we are at this topic: when resending a message, gnus does not remove the X-Gnus-Newsgroup header, X-From-Line too, which also seems wrong (first, there were no such headers in the original message, so they should not be present in the resent message, and second, it may easily confuse gnus on the recipient's side). Best regards, -- Vladimir.