From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49766 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: message registry for Gnus Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 13:10:24 +0100 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4n3cn9i6kq.fsf@lockgroove.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044187755 28397 80.91.224.249 (2 Feb 2003 12:09:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18fIvy-0007Nt-00 for ; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 13:09:14 +0100 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 18fIxQ-0004j2-00; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 06:10:44 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 02 Feb 2003 06:11:41 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA10190 for ; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 06:11:26 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (qmail 96921 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2003 12:10:25 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 96916 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2003 12:10:24 -0000 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244) by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 2 Feb 2003 12:10:24 -0000 Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18fJ2L-0001yX-00 for ; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 13:15:49 +0100 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding Original-Lines: 26 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: quimbies.gnus.org Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1044188149 7465 80.91.231.2 (2 Feb 2003 12:15:49 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Feb 2003 12:15:49 GMT Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: 2 Many DJ's's _As Heard on Radio Soulwax pt. 2_: "The Stooges & Salt 'n' Pepa - No Fun & Push It" Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEXZyq2pmH0MDgf7//RS U0QpKx6QbFH////18d7///GVM9kiAAACGUlEQVR4nG2TPW/bMBCGTwjgKpsOcIXORLTHk9PRBSV0 rSB6F8DebECD7I1GgETeAnRw8m97d7RkOe07aLhH732RhP6TuoRs6ZyDf0Bu/wce7/qFtxyvZ6Ab nrokWx8VzB0BABCzT2DdDQki5n4DtyAAx8lba3FZ3gCJW9Emj2AdCwdOo8A1ZOdAC3Aq/ruJ7V4A pAN3hbkEG3WcY43v/WGQdmMBcZzHMZ4GHYRK17TL+YCDOKLlW1aaCRxG4BkEdnSTA+JOGPzcOQPh dVyh1kgY1NvAqYZrqtFRN/yZaryDikFtGqzsCPaaRsTANJtSwbrnVQHwoVYtg8IUqKl2r3skQtTl IrGjaNWxOu+5fcuHURG9VAzMr68CQr/i8IZBaXPfCNiq47BOckJYVpWtFtYJsNpV9wcT/PKWV5yJ FBSkYD+cApzZRXxWVLKhqPzloMJpJ3EB0pVxHu4UfPQLy6AV8kOAA0zjbq3dsgPbCAoHbRY30pIV wJP+joDaZxkekgjG6jW07b0Uv18RzQHXwJQbG/ojjsDWWhzSk0wSyCpgn3cMLu9jn8h1jgMyqCcQ 8lZuLqk877e+XJ+QBZrkK5kkgmN6pJnqCYSPkM8sZgKn/j0ZiZd2Geiuzv0bxiDLqMA16dCdHpMx PAFjNhlI/zFcuisoEJe2sZcX45oJmAeSp13z5lRXYB4qr6HCFbeAL6v+KtvT28P6C3jaXXut/rvL AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uZjIe6BNS6RIjClov0jVXcezdOY= Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49766 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49766 Ted Zlatanov writes: > The message deletion hook (gnus-summary-article-delete-hook) > invocation in gnus-summary-move-article doesn't seem to do anything, > when is that 'junk condition in gnus-sum.el used? You have `gnus-move-split-methods', which can return groups and `junk', which means "delete this". Mostly useful when respooling. > I think I got expiry and deletion right otherwise, can you check? > Especially expiry is tricky, I'm not sure I understand the whole > function. Could you do a unified diff? I have a hard time reading raw diffs... > Incoming messages seem to be spooled in several places, so I'm not > sure how to deal with that. I only want to intercept nnmail and > nnimap for now, should I just prepend the hook call to their > respective split-methods? I think that would probably be the best way, but I forget how that stuff works in detail... :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen