From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/49430
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Frank Tegtmeyer <fte@fte.to>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: List-Post vs. Mail-Followup-To.
Date: 21 Jan 2003 13:20:34 +0100
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m3lm1eg0dp.fsf@teg.local>
References: <m3hec4iuhq.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
	<m3fzrnowxu.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org>
	<m3iswid7sy.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043151596 4101 80.91.224.249 (21 Jan 2003 12:19:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 12:19:56 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18axNi-00013o-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 13:19:55 +0100
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 18axOh-0006aW-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 06:20:55 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 21 Jan 2003 06:21:51 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (sclp3.sclp.com [66.230.238.2])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA26273
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 06:21:39 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 76112 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2003 12:20:40 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 76107 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 12:20:40 -0000
Original-Received: from unknown (HELO mail.zindler.com) (217.160.107.148)
  by 66.230.238.6 with SMTP; 21 Jan 2003 12:20:40 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 16513 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 12:20:59 -0000
Original-Received: from pd9e09357.dip.t-dialin.net (217.224.147.87)
  by mail.zindler.com with QMTP; 21 Jan 2003 12:20:59 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 20726 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jan 2003 12:20:34 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: dU\mXwf?KS(Sx?0y(1{8c=3W~Z,S+bzMe26W8YMmm7]9>tU:erm1G3NT,L"kwEQUZA]SPG&
 (s=v$)Gr@uS4HOlG2]<MT"Y"8fx&Py$FDp'b5/`--0214u~`aF-6e"i%^^5?\D;cv:'22[R)YxvH'+
 =5l>k5
In-Reply-To: <m3iswid7sy.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
Original-Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49430
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:49430

Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> writes:

> Are there any standardization efforts for Mail-Followup-To: and friends?

djb will not put any effort into RFCs anymore.

> Those "Reply-To mungers" always pull back on this "it's not RFC, we
> don't care, don't use elm and let us munge Reply-To" issue.

You could write an RFC. The reasoning for MFT could be taken literally
from djb's website.

Regards, Frank