Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bill White" <billw@wolfram.com>
Subject: Re: Oort releases
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:43:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3lmhkj3m5.fsf@wolfram.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vxkr8rdyob1.fsf@cinnamon.vanillaknot.com> (Karl Kleinpaste's message of "Mon, 05 Nov 2001 15:07:14 -0500")

On Mon Nov 05 2001 at 14:07, Karl Kleinpaste <karl@charcoal.com> said:

> Having commented a few moments ago about pGnus releases, it occurs
> to me that Oort is essentially never being updated.  That is, Oort
> has been in progress for...well, I'm not sure, but it's well over a
> year, and we've only gotten up to 0.04 so far.  I'll grant that
> Lars' former habits of releasing more than once a day at times was
> perhaps excessive, but shouldn't we get a consistent tarball out to
> folks a bit more regularly than we have up to this point?  oGnus
> 0.04 has been in existence for months, and there really are people
> who would like to use the under-development branch without cutting
> the soles of their feet on the bleeding edge of daily-CVS' potential
> hosage.
>
> If Oort isn't actually killing anybody off this week, could we hand
> users a new version, and move on to 0.05?

Hear, hear!  And regular releases after that?  With Lars out of
touch/country/planet and the snapshots out of commission, it'd be nice
to have something easily available.  

I haven't seen a changelog in ages, but it seems from here that
ShengHuo ZHU, Simon Josefsson, Per Abrahamsen et. al. have sorta
replaced Lars in the daily gnus info loop; perhaps one of them could
make regular (weekly or so?) releases.

Cheers -

Bill
-- 
Bill White
"No, ma'am, we're musicians."



  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-11-05 21:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-11-05 20:07 Karl Kleinpaste
2001-11-05 20:46 ` Matt Armstrong
2001-11-05 21:43 ` Bill White [this message]
2001-11-06  8:39   ` Kai Großjohann
2001-11-06  9:39 ` Per Abrahamsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3lmhkj3m5.fsf@wolfram.com \
    --to=billw@wolfram.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).