From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32990 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Mail-{Followup,Reply}-To Date: 27 Oct 2000 12:00:09 -0400 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169178 22796 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:59:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05F2D049A for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:01:12 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB29558; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:00:59 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:00:20 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA21390 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:00:09 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (multivac.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu [129.22.239.69]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3702CD049A for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:00:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 10543 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2000 16:00:31 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "27 Oct 2000 11:30:40 -0400" Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32990 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32990 A news followup to a message without a Followup-To goes to the same newsgroups as the previous message. This is usually what the poster wants, so Followup-To is usually not set. But for mail, without MFT, a followup goes to the poster as well. This is usually not what the poster wants, so MFT will be set more often than FT. So I think obedience of these fields should be controlled by separate variables. (I made MFT obedience depend on message-use-followup-to.) To be sort of parallel with that variable, I'm thinking something like: message-use-mail-followup-to nil always ignore MFT use always use MFT ask always ask t use MFT if it matches To+Cc (not To+Cc+From), otherwise ask Sound good? I think the default should be t. paul