From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/24885 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: bug in date washing Date: 27 Aug 1999 22:02:33 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162374 11177 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:06:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12840 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 16:23:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAB23623; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:07:35 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:08:11 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13551 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:07:59 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (bang.netfonds.no [195.1.89.231]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12364 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 16:07:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA13300; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 22:09:38 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Adam Hochschild's _King Leopold's Ghost_ X-Now-Playing: Joni Mitchell's _Shadows And Light (cd2)_: "Woodstock" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann's?= message of "19 Jul 1999 13:00:44 +0200" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > I'm pretty sure that repeated W T l invocations are not supposed to > change the date, are they? Eurm. Well, uhm, probably not. But then the original date should be stored somewhere... (This used to work OK before, because then we just looked at the article header structure, but we can't do that now, since the function may be called on a multipart that contains a message/rfc822 part or the like.) Local variables won't work... Text props? Stuff the original date in a text prop, and then use that? Yup. Fix in Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen