0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken

0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken

[Vladimir Volovich]

Hi,

thanks, Lars :)
Hmm... Lines: header is still generated for mml, not for MIME...
(and is thus very small)

	Best regards, -- Vladimir.

Re: 0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Vladimir Volovich <vvv@vvv.vsu.ru> writes:

> Hmm... Lines: header is still generated for mml, not for MIME...
> (and is thus very small)

I'm unable to reproduce this.  If I `C-c C-a' an image, the Lines
header generated is correct when I send the message.

Where do you see this incorrect Lines header?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen

Re: 0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken

[Vladimir Volovich]

"LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes:

 >> Hmm... Lines: header is still generated for mml, not for MIME...
 >> (and is thus very small)

 LMI> I'm unable to reproduce this.  If I `C-c C-a' an image, the
 LMI> Lines header generated is correct when I send the message.

 LMI> Where do you see this incorrect Lines header?

[strangely, my reply stilll did not propagate to the list, so here is
it again]

when i send a mail like (`#' signs removed):

To: root
Subject: test
--text follows this line--
Hi

	Best regards, -- Vladimir.

<part type="application/octet-stream" filename="/tmp/filename.tgz" disposition=attachment>
</part>

the recipient receives a message with "Lines: 7"; the same value of
lines is in the *sent mail* buffer.

	Best regards, -- Vladimir.

Re: 0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Vladimir Volovich <vvv@vvv.vsu.ru> writes:

> <part type="application/octet-stream" filename="/tmp/filename.tgz" disposition=attachment>
> </part>
> 
> the recipient receives a message with "Lines: 7"; the same value of
> lines is in the *sent mail* buffer.

I'm still not able to reproduce this.  Do you get the same result no
matter what the type of the non-textual part is?  For instance, do you 
get the same results with jpegs?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen