* 0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken
@ 1999-07-09 23:02 Vladimir Volovich
1999-07-11 9:15 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Volovich @ 1999-07-09 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
thanks, Lars :)
Hmm... Lines: header is still generated for mml, not for MIME...
(and is thus very small)
Best regards, -- Vladimir.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken
1999-07-09 23:02 0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken Vladimir Volovich
@ 1999-07-11 9:15 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-07-13 7:46 ` Vladimir Volovich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 1999-07-11 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
Vladimir Volovich <vvv@vvv.vsu.ru> writes:
> Hmm... Lines: header is still generated for mml, not for MIME...
> (and is thus very small)
I'm unable to reproduce this. If I `C-c C-a' an image, the Lines
header generated is correct when I send the message.
Where do you see this incorrect Lines header?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken
1999-07-11 9:15 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 1999-07-13 7:46 ` Vladimir Volovich
1999-08-27 18:13 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Volovich @ 1999-07-13 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
"LMI" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes:
>> Hmm... Lines: header is still generated for mml, not for MIME...
>> (and is thus very small)
LMI> I'm unable to reproduce this. If I `C-c C-a' an image, the
LMI> Lines header generated is correct when I send the message.
LMI> Where do you see this incorrect Lines header?
[strangely, my reply stilll did not propagate to the list, so here is
it again]
when i send a mail like (`#' signs removed):
To: root
Subject: test
--text follows this line--
Hi
Best regards, -- Vladimir.
<part type="application/octet-stream" filename="/tmp/filename.tgz" disposition=attachment>
</part>
the recipient receives a message with "Lines: 7"; the same value of
lines is in the *sent mail* buffer.
Best regards, -- Vladimir.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken
1999-07-13 7:46 ` Vladimir Volovich
@ 1999-08-27 18:13 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 1999-08-27 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
Vladimir Volovich <vvv@vvv.vsu.ru> writes:
> <part type="application/octet-stream" filename="/tmp/filename.tgz" disposition=attachment>
> </part>
>
> the recipient receives a message with "Lines: 7"; the same value of
> lines is in the *sent mail* buffer.
I'm still not able to reproduce this. Do you get the same result no
matter what the type of the non-textual part is? For instance, do you
get the same results with jpegs?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-08-27 18:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-07-09 23:02 0.95 fixed a problem with binary attachments, but Lines is still broken Vladimir Volovich
1999-07-11 9:15 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1999-07-13 7:46 ` Vladimir Volovich
1999-08-27 18:13 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).