From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12820 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: "best/first group" when only ticked articles remain everywhere Date: 13 Nov 1997 22:26:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152290 5859 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:18:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA26546 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 15:48:10 -0800 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA11511 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 17:48:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.7/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id XAA06548 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 23:33:08 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (qmail 465 invoked by uid 504); 13 Nov 1997 22:33:07 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 457 invoked from network); 13 Nov 1997 22:33:04 -0000 Original-Received: from xyplex17.uio.no (HELO sparky.gnus.org) (129.240.154.37) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 1997 22:33:03 -0000 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA09111; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 23:32:54 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Karl Kleinpaste's message of "09 Nov 1997 18:11:49 -0500" X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.14/XEmacs 19.15 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > When I get through everything, I end up with a *Group* buffer > containing nothing but groups marked with a `*'. At such a point, I'd > like to get to the topmost group "easily." To me, this means hitting > something like `,' or `.' which want to find best/first _unread_ > group. How hard would it be to modify this behavior to do a fall-back > to best/first group with _anything_ in it if there are no groups with > genuinely unread articles available? It wouldn't be difficult at all, but it's a rather special case, so I don't feel that this is useful enough to warrant adding to Gnus. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen