From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/71435 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnimap expiry Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:27:12 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87mxrbq628.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwx2hqxf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hidj4ps.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87eiclelso.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285176639 5494 80.91.229.12 (22 Sep 2010 17:30:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:30:39 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19808@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Sep 22 19:30:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyT9O-00046Y-R9 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:30:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OyT93-0004Sz-BD; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:30:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OyT91-0004Sa-I6 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OyT8x-00030w-6r for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:30:11 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OyT8v-0003mV-00 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:30:05 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OyT8u-0003zZ-PN for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:30:04 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:30:04 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:30:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEUrAgFFBwbBiGX34bRg EAyuVi16Lx0XAADAGEqpAAACM0lEQVQ4jW2UTXPbIBCGl5lMdYUMdc9Fo/wAmNyjFHOvEnS2U9he nVz09/susmLH052xhfdhP3hZi2I0mpaTimI1T0OJiblEipVHQ0RqBTkXPBvYO9gDiF1BXI3is4Ah aiL7H+DyHLWyN8CH4OE5GrP/AkJYwauJe855NM02IC2S2XPh5kZFgL4PLqaI+nbUCq3TGcCcSZlH stjcSd/jmsp7Z4RwxcdOA9SQCC/tYrWDIFhVbDwio3n2gwCQuzwhaX7B1xDJ3AeJGFHP7KfWeC9t krGiWpTuY3xrYJJ2yCjp267H3ffeZTcIIU2qbRYrtUI1dDD1AkgCwLCAVg7iuCH3ZASIsmlUo4Ey AHnI0xmQqrWoOGrT7gRGy7KcSJ/ucKcaxNh0Bh2APRBXLscjH38jlxtmAIS8JyZOh8Lf7A9OPK1A UnWkrVz6Ij8UpmOrcYKW5QmKQxbTfcfx1hpyNUjFjCLMf5e3HsJIvAAlQ9ctq9kpPAKcNrD54dg5 avuJhC7LhayeK9+GzBrR3YJFbakavA48e5VuD30JpTYjctYZs2uL3qIoXOwB/yeM7lrxGoRh8m7m uSX8AvzkB+beP3U3QMat1Bz8oVuo/wIe8+tORvFnR3Jj7kKZja3SCIAM+WZzTEfMAyaugU9/5ijT V+c/N2AuIy7RwhUoXQMEdO8OL4b0QvLm+KxRTLd8hIfE6Y0iyAbmESf7FTxjiAiD/gmKhhZofeAd gI2pXgV8iDSvaf4HqqsVIbgJSecAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Hector Zazou & Swara's _In the House of Mirrors_: "Wanna Mako" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:iFHXdtpiTomc8cpZ636V2bGivKM= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:71435 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: >> `B DEL' works to delete the article; I confirmed that nnimap-expunge >> doesn't make a difference to the issue noted above. So it looks like the >> gnus-expire flag used to become \Deleted in older Gnus after >> `gnus-summary-expire-articles-now' but now doesn't. LMI> I don't think the expire flag makes any difference... > Sorry? I thought it would. Are you saying `B DEL' is the only way to > truly delete an article immediately now? The expiry flag (per se) has never deleted anything. It only presents candidates for deletion, and then you choose subsets of the expiry-marked articles and then delete them. (Or all of them, in the -now case.) So to answer your question -- no, `B DEL' isn't the only way to delete articles. But I think we're talking past each other here. I thought you were talking about the gnus-expire mark on the IMAP server. It has no meaning in an IMAP context as such. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen