From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/58571 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnmaildir & expiry (again..) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:06:54 -0400 Organization: What did you have in mind? A short, blunt, human pyramid? Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <86hdq06f2i.fsf@ID-110038.user.uni-berlin.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096035111 9131 80.91.229.6 (24 Sep 2004 14:11:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7109@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Sep 24 16:11:36 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CAqnQ-0007FR-00 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:11:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CAqn2-0007l6-00; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:11:12 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CAqmu-0007l0-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CAqmu-0000ff-3d for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mirapoint1.tis.cwru.edu (mirapoint1.TIS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.104.46]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1D43A003B for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:11:00 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from multivac.cwru.edu (multivac.ITS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.114.26]) by mirapoint1.tis.cwru.edu (MOS 3.4.3-CR) with SMTP id CQM51502; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 10:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (qmail 358 invoked by uid 500); 24 Sep 2004 14:07:17 -0000 Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <86hdq06f2i.fsf@ID-110038.user.uni-berlin.de> =?iso-8859-1?Q?=28Rapha=EBl?= Berbain's message of "Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:00:07 +0200") Mail-Copies-To: nobody Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-Junkmail-Status: score=0/45, host=mirapoint1.tis.cwru.edu Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58571 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:58571 raphael.berbain@free.fr (Rapha=EBl Berbain) wrote: > The problem is, after being expired the article appears unread again > in the target group. If you want all the articles in the target group to be marked as read, you could set (always-marks . ['(read)]) in the group parameters. > What should be the right behavior ? Copying all the marks (except 'expire) from the original article would probably be good. I'll have a look at that. > Regardless of this, I think both backends should behave in the same > way. Yes, the backend interface ought to be redesigned to put less (i.e., no) policy decisions in the backends. But that's a big job. paul