>>>>> On 16 Jul 2004 13:00:23 -0400, "Ted Zlatanov" <tzz@lifelogs.com> said:

Ted> Well, I have no answer.  The function spam-list-articles is
Ted> correct for everyone except you - in your case, even though mark
Ted> 36 ($) is a spam-mark, spam articles are not gathered by
Ted> spam-list-articles.  I don't know what could be interfering with
Ted> spam-list-articles, and my advice is to do (debug) statements in
Ted> the spam-list-articles source, and see where the problem is.  I
Ted> would gladly do this for you, but I simply can't duplicate the
Ted> error!

First of all, thank you very much for your continued effort to solve
 my trouble.  I tried M-x debug-on-entry RET spam-list-articles RET.
 I obtained the following results, which was different from previous
 result which demonstrated the value of 36, i.e., spam mark.