* 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace'
@ 2004-03-29 11:25 Xavier Maillard
2004-05-16 14:02 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xavier Maillard @ 2004-03-29 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
Yo,
Still learning Gnus article treat function.
Should 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' still exist since it can break RFC2646 ?
Regards,
zeDek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace'
2004-03-29 11:25 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Xavier Maillard
@ 2004-05-16 14:02 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2004-05-16 21:31 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Steinar Bang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2004-05-16 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org> writes:
> Should 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' still exist since it can break
> RFC2646 ?
Which standard is that? :-)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace'
2004-05-16 14:02 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2004-05-16 21:31 ` Steinar Bang
2004-05-16 23:19 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steinar Bang @ 2004-05-16 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>:
> Xavier Maillard <zedek@gnu-rox.org> writes:
>> Should 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' still exist since it can break
>> RFC2646 ?
> Which standard is that? :-)
Format=Fixed, Format=Flowed parameter on text/plain.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2646.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace'
2004-05-16 21:31 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Steinar Bang
@ 2004-05-16 23:19 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2004-05-16 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no> writes:
>>> Should 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' still exist since it can break
>>> RFC2646 ?
>
>> Which standard is that? :-)
>
> Format=Fixed, Format=Flowed parameter on text/plain.
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2646.html
Right. But isn't format=flowed handling done before the gnus-treat-*
functions are run?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-16 23:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-29 11:25 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Xavier Maillard
2004-05-16 14:02 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2004-05-16 21:31 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Steinar Bang
2004-05-16 23:19 ` 'gnus-treat-leading-whitespace' Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).