From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56519 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Matthias Andree Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: RFC-2231 vs. RFC-2047 Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:52:13 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1078339973 30819 80.91.224.253 (3 Mar 2004 18:52:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5060@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Mar 03 19:52:47 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AybU6-0001X1-00 for ; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 19:52:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AybTj-0000hQ-00; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:52:23 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AybTf-0000hL-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 12:52:19 -0600 Original-Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org (pD951F412.dip.t-dialin.net [217.81.244.18]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAA33A0054 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 12:52:16 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id D29C4AD40D; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 19:52:13 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56519 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:56519 Hi, Gnus appears to have some difficulties handling RFC-2231, I haven't even checked if it's supposed to be implemented. This is from the Usefor mailing list, a summary line: R 20040303T162159 [ 20: Charles Lindsey ] Re: =?us-ascii*la?q?Re:_?= Re: This is a language specification according to RFC-2231 section 5 in context with RFC-2047. reformime (ships with maildrop) decodes this fine, and I find not obvious flaws. I'd rather have the subject be "Re: Re: Re:" which, albeit only a tiny bit less ugly, is the right thing to show. -- Matthias Andree Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95