Re: Verifying inline gpg signatures

[Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com>]

Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com> writes:

[We fail to detect inline PGP with format=flowed]

> Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:
>
>> Perhaps mm-uu-dissect should be run on all text/plain parts?  Or all
>> text/.* parts?  Opinions?
>
> It's a step in the right direction ... but not enough.  The problem is
> that text/plain parts with a format parameter haven't been QP decoded
> at this stage, so uu-dissect will fail.

But I suppose making it work for non-QP encoded articles is better than
nothing?

I first assumed that it wouldn't be useful because Gnus always QP
encodes inline PGP, so it didn't work when I tested it with a message
from Gnus.  But the Mozilla plugin which probably generates all of the
problematic messages doesn't do it for us-ascii, so it works in that
case.

Should we do it?