From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/38451
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@scientist.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Problem with subject line and %B
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 23:21:17 +0200
Organization: Gnus Information Center
Message-ID: <m3n14h6y7m.fsf@neo.loria>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035174312 22507 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:25:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:25:12 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <news@quimby.gnus.org>
Return-Path: <news@quimby.gnus.org>
Original-Received: (qmail 3279 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 21:20:09 -0000
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (195.204.10.139)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 21:20:09 -0000
Original-Received: (from news@localhost)
	by quimby.gnus.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA07372
	for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 23:20:05 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Path: lucas.loria!nobody
Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: d42-43.ppp.teaser.fr
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 999206404 14606 213.91.42.43 (30 Aug 2001 21:20:04 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Aug 2001 21:20:04 GMT
X-PGP-KeyID: 0xF22A794E
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5854 AF2B 65B2 0E96 2161  E32B 285B D7A1 F22A 794E
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial
 Intelligence)
Original-Lines: 57
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38451
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:38451

Hi !

I have just upgraded to Oort (today's CVS) and I run into some trouble
with subject line. Here is what I use :

(setq gnus-summary-line-format
      "%U%R%z(%d) %B%(%[%-12,12f%]%)%e %s\n")

And I haven't changed gnus-sum-*.

Here is some oddity I get :

R. (30-Aug) > [Nicolas LS  ]= Re: Modem USB ADSL
R. (30-Aug)                                   \-> [Thomas Nemet]  

And if I try to fetch parent article, I get something like that :

RA+(30-Aug) [Christophe F]= Re: ca compile ! :)
R  (30-Aug)             \-> <Qing Liu    >= 
R  (30-Aug)               +-> [pierre      ]= 
R  (30-Aug)               | \-> [Qing Liu    ]= 
R  (30-Aug)               |   \-> [tontonTh    ]= 
R  (30-Aug)               |     \-> [Loic Tortay ]= 
RA (30-Aug)               |       \-> [Christophe F]  
RA+(30-Aug) [Christophe F]= Bla bla

It is like if some lines are hidden (between first and second line and
just before the last line).

And I can get things like that :

R.+(30-Aug) > [Qing Liu    ]= Re: Un signe annonciateur d'une journee reussie
 .+(30-Aug)   \-> [Thomas Nemet]  
 .+(30-Aug)     \-> <Qing Liu    >  
 .+(30-Aug)       \-> <Nicolas LS  >= 
 .+(30-Aug)         \-> [Thomas Nemet]= 
 .+(30-Aug)           \-> [Nicolas LS  ]  
 .+(30-Aug)             \-> <Nicolas LS  >  
 .+(30-Aug)               \-> <Benjamin FRA>  

For this one, a more "normal" display would be (not sure since I have
never used %B before) :

R.+(30-Aug) > [Qing Liu    ]= Re: Un signe annonciateur d'une journee reussie
 .+(30-Aug)   \-> [Thomas Nemet]  
 .+(30-Aug) \-> <Qing Liu    >  
 .+(30-Aug) \-> <Nicolas LS  >= 
 .+(30-Aug)   \-> [Thomas Nemet]= 
 .+(30-Aug)     \-> [Nicolas LS  ]  
 .+(30-Aug) \-> <Nicolas LS  >  
 .+(30-Aug) \-> <Benjamin FRA>  

Instead, "orphans" become children of the article which is just above.

If I reconstruct the thread (A T), I always get a "good" display.

Any idea ?