From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36373 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sender header? Date: 24 May 2001 21:12:18 -0400 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Message-ID: References: <01May23.141128edt.115245@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.115917edt.115250@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.143521edt.115214@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.153439edt.115213@gateway.intersys.com> <01May24.171325edt.115217@gateway.intersys.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171969 8262 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:46:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 1472 invoked by alias); 25 May 2001 01:12:20 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 1467 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 01:12:19 -0000 Original-Received: from h0060978d8c91.ne.mediaone.net (HELO peorth.gweep.net) (ratinox@24.147.75.115) by gnus.org with SMTP; 25 May 2001 01:12:19 -0000 Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by peorth.gweep.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA01492; Thu, 24 May 2001 21:12:18 -0400 Original-To: "(ding)" X-Attribution: Rat In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Original-Lines: 23 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36373 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36373 * prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) on Thu, 24 May 2001 | But I though you wanted Sender to have the user's canonical address. | In this case, the user's cacnonical address very clearly does not | include the system's current FQDN. You are assuming that sender == originator. Don't do that. | You don't seem to understand DNS. The dialup's name has an A record, | and may (but need not) have an MX record. The A record certainly does | not have an MX record associated with it. It should have an MX record associated with it. All A records should have associated MX records. | > Internally those fields should be as canonical as possible. It is the | > responsiblity of the mail gateway to properly masqerade header fields. | Where does RFC 2822 make that requirement? Definition of "mailbox". -- Rat \ Caution: Happy Fun Ball may suddenly Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ accelerate to dangerous speeds. PGP Key: at a key server near you! \