From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22346 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Rupa Schomaker (list)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: comments on pgnus-v0.80 Date: 08 Apr 1999 07:10:29 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160283 28862 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:31:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA14884 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 10:15:14 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB14395; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 09:11:11 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 08 Apr 1999 09:11:40 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA00371 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 09:11:28 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from gw.rupa.com (postfix@cx309091-a.alsv1.occa.home.com [24.1.169.211]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA14780 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 10:11:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by gw.rupa.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6AE5D5E70; Thu, 8 Apr 1999 07:10:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: SL Baur's message of "08 Apr 1999 03:59:59 -0700" Original-Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.07008 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.80) XEmacs/20.4 (Emerald) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22346 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:22346 SL Baur writes: > Per Abrahamsen writes in ding@gnus.org: > > > SL Baur writes: > >> * Notwithstanding the previous item and the coolness of Lars' > >> presentation, I'm not sure I like handing html parts to W3 as a > >> default. It was pretty cool that tm blanked it out -- html > >> doesn't belong in either mail or news. How fast does this all > >> work on slow(er) machines? W3 flies on Demeter, but that's not > >> exactly a fair test yet. > > > I don't even notice that some articles are in HTML rather than plain > > text. This is on a 166 Mhz UltraSPARC. I don't think you can buy > > PC's slower than that today. > > O.K. Fair enough. Objection dropped. Where W3 really breaks on my machine is on the only piece of HTML email that I actually read. It is about 60K and is a multi-level table. Rendering it takes about 30s - 1min on my PPro 200. Very slow. Regular "HTML Email" that most people generate renders immediately. I think that tables just take forever to render... -- Rupa (rupa@rupa.com for normal email) Please don't email duplicate replies.