* Entering large groups
@ 2011-03-01 16:20 Antoine Levitt
2011-03-01 16:31 ` Alberto Luaces
2011-03-05 11:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2011-03-01 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1243 bytes --]
When I enter groups larger than gnus-large-newsgroup, gnus prompts me
for a number. For instance, when I open my mail inbox to review the last
couple of emails I got, I usually always answer "100", which I'm tired
of doing. From what I've seen, there's no simple way to hook into the
code. The only message on the mailing list I found relating to this is
this, with pretty much the same conclusion:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10918
(Wow, 1997. I didn't even have a computer :))
I thought there'd be greater demand for this, emacs users seeming to
cringe at the idea of typing anything unnecessary ;)
So here's a patch with a new setting, gnus-large-newsgroup-action, that
defines what to do when entering a large group. However, it still
doesn't cater to the case where you'd temporarily need to see older
messages, which I've settled with an ugly
(define-key gnus-group-mode-map (kbd "<C-return>")
(lambda () (interactive) (let ((gnus-large-newsgroup-action 'query))
(gnus-group-select-group))))
in my .gnus.
Anyone see a better way of handling this? A nice way out would be some
kind of "P" on steroids, where you could specify how many more messages
you want. Is there something like that already?
Antoine
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: patch-large-groups.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 3141 bytes --]
diff --git a/lisp/gnus/gnus-sum.el b/lisp/gnus/gnus-sum.el
index abe6367..e370a84 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus/gnus-sum.el
+++ b/lisp/gnus/gnus-sum.el
@@ -1260,6 +1260,13 @@ type of files to save."
:group 'gnus-summary
:type 'regexp)
+(defcustom gnus-summary-save-parts-only-non-display nil
+ "*Whether to only save parts that are not displayed in
+ `gnus-summary-save-parts' (\\<gnus-summary-mode-map>\\[gnus-summary-save-parts]). Check
+ is performed using `mm-automatic-display-p'."
+ :group 'gnus-summary
+ :type 'boolean)
+
(defcustom gnus-read-all-available-headers nil
"Whether Gnus should parse all headers made available to it.
This is mostly relevant for slow back ends where the user may
@@ -5842,20 +5849,25 @@ If SELECT-ARTICLES, only select those articles from GROUP."
((and (or (<= scored marked) (= scored number))
(numberp gnus-large-newsgroup)
(> number gnus-large-newsgroup))
- (let* ((cursor-in-echo-area nil)
- (initial (gnus-parameter-large-newsgroup-initial
- gnus-newsgroup-name))
- (input
- (read-string
- (format
- "How many articles from %s (%s %d): "
- (gnus-group-decoded-name gnus-newsgroup-name)
- (if initial "max" "default")
- number)
- (if initial
- (cons (number-to-string initial)
- 0)))))
- (if (string-match "^[ \t]*$" input) number input)))
+ (cond
+ ((equal gnus-large-newsgroup-action 'query)
+ (let* ((cursor-in-echo-area nil)
+ (initial (gnus-parameter-large-newsgroup-initial
+ gnus-newsgroup-name))
+ (input
+ (read-string
+ (format
+ "How many articles from %s (%s %d): "
+ (gnus-group-decoded-name gnus-newsgroup-name)
+ (if initial "max" "default")
+ number)
+ (if initial
+ (cons (number-to-string initial)
+ 0)))))
+ (if (string-match "^[ \t]*$" input) number input)))
+ ((integerp gnus-large-newsgroup-action) gnus-large-newsgroup-action)
+ ((functionp gnus-large-newsgroup-action) (funcall gnus-large-newsgroup-action))
+ (t (error "Wrong type for gnus-large-newsgroup-action"))))
((and (> scored marked) (< scored number)
(> (- scored number) 20))
(let ((input
diff --git a/lisp/gnus/gnus.el b/lisp/gnus/gnus.el
index a5c7279..403436c 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus/gnus.el
+++ b/lisp/gnus/gnus.el
@@ -1457,6 +1457,16 @@ Also see `gnus-large-ephemeral-newsgroup'."
:type '(choice (const :tag "No limit" nil)
integer))
+(defcustom gnus-large-newsgroup-action 'query
+ "*The action to take when entering a large newsgroup. Choices are
+'query to prompt the user (default), a number to display that many
+messages, or a user-defined function whose return value is the number
+of messages to display."
+ :group 'gnus-group-select
+ :type '(choice (const :tag "Ask the user" query)
+ integer
+ function))
+
(defcustom gnus-use-long-file-name (not (memq system-type '(usg-unix-v)))
"Non-nil means that the default name of a file to save articles in is the group name.
If it's nil, the directory form of the group name is used instead.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-01 16:20 Entering large groups Antoine Levitt
@ 2011-03-01 16:31 ` Alberto Luaces
2011-03-02 7:30 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-03-05 11:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alberto Luaces @ 2011-03-01 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Antoine Levitt writes:
> When I enter groups larger than gnus-large-newsgroup, gnus prompts me
> for a number. For instance, when I open my mail inbox to review the last
> couple of emails I got, I usually always answer "100", which I'm tired
> of doing.
Maybe this is a bug or a misconfiguration. I'm only asked for the number
of article headers to display if the number of *unseen* articles is
greater than gnus-large-newsgroup, so it doesn't happen frequently.
--
Alberto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-01 16:31 ` Alberto Luaces
@ 2011-03-02 7:30 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-03-02 8:30 ` Alberto Luaces
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Eric S Fraga @ 2011-03-02 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alberto Luaces; +Cc: ding
Alberto Luaces <aluaces@udc.es> writes:
> Antoine Levitt writes:
>
>> When I enter groups larger than gnus-large-newsgroup, gnus prompts me
>> for a number. For instance, when I open my mail inbox to review the last
>> couple of emails I got, I usually always answer "100", which I'm tired
>> of doing.
>
> Maybe this is a bug or a misconfiguration. I'm only asked for the number
> of article headers to display if the number of *unseen* articles is
> greater than gnus-large-newsgroup, so it doesn't happen frequently.
You also get asked if there are *no* unseen articles; in this case, it
asks to determine how many of the /seen/ articles you want to see again.
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1 + No Gnus v0.14
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-02 7:30 ` Eric S Fraga
@ 2011-03-02 8:30 ` Alberto Luaces
2011-03-02 10:32 ` Antoine Levitt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alberto Luaces @ 2011-03-02 8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Alberto Luaces writes:
>
>> Antoine Levitt writes:
>>
>>> When I enter groups larger than gnus-large-newsgroup, gnus prompts me
>>> for a number. For instance, when I open my mail inbox to review the last
>>> couple of emails I got, I usually always answer "100", which I'm tired
>>> of doing.
>>
>> Maybe this is a bug or a misconfiguration. I'm only asked for the number
>> of article headers to display if the number of *unseen* articles is
>> greater than gnus-large-newsgroup, so it doesn't happen frequently.
>
> You also get asked if there are *no* unseen articles; in this case, it
> asks to determine how many of the /seen/ articles you want to see again.
Yes, you are right; I forgot I have marked articles in most of my groups.
--
Alberto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-02 8:30 ` Alberto Luaces
@ 2011-03-02 10:32 ` Antoine Levitt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2011-03-02 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
02/03/11 09:30, Alberto Luaces
> Eric S Fraga writes:
>
>> Alberto Luaces writes:
>>
>>> Antoine Levitt writes:
>>>
>>>> When I enter groups larger than gnus-large-newsgroup, gnus prompts me
>>>> for a number. For instance, when I open my mail inbox to review the last
>>>> couple of emails I got, I usually always answer "100", which I'm tired
>>>> of doing.
>>>
>>> Maybe this is a bug or a misconfiguration. I'm only asked for the number
>>> of article headers to display if the number of *unseen* articles is
>>> greater than gnus-large-newsgroup, so it doesn't happen frequently.
>>
>> You also get asked if there are *no* unseen articles; in this case, it
>> asks to determine how many of the /seen/ articles you want to see again.
>
> Yes, you are right; I forgot I have marked articles in most of my groups.
Right, this is the case I'm concerned with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-01 16:20 Entering large groups Antoine Levitt
2011-03-01 16:31 ` Alberto Luaces
@ 2011-03-05 11:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-05 11:35 ` Antoine Levitt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2011-03-05 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:
> When I enter groups larger than gnus-large-newsgroup, gnus prompts me
> for a number. For instance, when I open my mail inbox to review the last
> couple of emails I got, I usually always answer "100", which I'm tired
> of doing.
[...]
> So here's a patch with a new setting, gnus-large-newsgroup-action, that
> defines what to do when entering a large group. However, it still
> doesn't cater to the case where you'd temporarily need to see older
> messages
I agree that the prompting when entering groups where all the articles
are unread is less than optimal, so I think we should try to find a way
to make it better without needing customisation.
Today, it defaults to using the number of (read) articles in the group.
How about if we just change the default to be, say, 100 -- I think just
reading the last few messages is what most people want, anyway.
So the typical group entry would be `RET RET', which I don't think is
very strenuous.
To get the old default (i.e., the total number of articles in the
group), we could put that number on `M-p', so `RET M-p RET' would give
you the old behaviour.
And, of course, you'd still be able to type in whatever number you want
to.
Thoughts?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-05 11:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2011-03-05 11:35 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-05 11:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2011-03-05 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
05/03/11 12:09, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
> Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> When I enter groups larger than gnus-large-newsgroup, gnus prompts me
>> for a number. For instance, when I open my mail inbox to review the last
>> couple of emails I got, I usually always answer "100", which I'm tired
>> of doing.
>
> [...]
>
>> So here's a patch with a new setting, gnus-large-newsgroup-action, that
>> defines what to do when entering a large group. However, it still
>> doesn't cater to the case where you'd temporarily need to see older
>> messages
>
> I agree that the prompting when entering groups where all the articles
> are unread is less than optimal, so I think we should try to find a way
> to make it better without needing customisation.
>
> Today, it defaults to using the number of (read) articles in the group.
> How about if we just change the default to be, say, 100 -- I think just
> reading the last few messages is what most people want, anyway.
That's a much better idea than mine. Why not just use
gnus-large-newsgroup as default though? That way it would have a
well-defined semantics from the user point of view: it's the maximum
number of messages you're willing to display in a summary buffer.
The prompt could look like "How many messages? (default
gnus-large-newsgroup, available COUNT)", so the user could still see how
many messages there are.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-05 11:35 ` Antoine Levitt
@ 2011-03-05 11:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-09 11:07 ` Antoine Levitt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2011-03-05 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:
> That's a much better idea than mine. Why not just use
> gnus-large-newsgroup as default though?
That makes sense.
> The prompt could look like "How many messages? (default
> gnus-large-newsgroup, available COUNT)", so the user could still see how
> many messages there are.
Yup.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-05 11:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2011-03-09 11:07 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-15 16:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2011-03-09 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1125 bytes --]
05/03/11 12:39, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
> Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> That's a much better idea than mine. Why not just use
>> gnus-large-newsgroup as default though?
>
> That makes sense.
>
>> The prompt could look like "How many messages? (default
>> gnus-large-newsgroup, available COUNT)", so the user could still see how
>> many messages there are.
>
> Yup.
Would this do? I'm not too sure about
gnus-parameter-large-newsgroup-initial, which was used in a really weird
way before, so I basically set it to override the default value in the
prompt. Does anyone even use this, anyway? It seems weird to have a
group-specific setting that isn't customizable in the first place.
I didn't touch the score bit, which doesn't have default values for some
reason.
I also took the liberty to use gnus-group-real-name in order to get
prettier prompts (gmane.emacs.gnus.general instead of nttp+news.etc)
Also, the code really should use read-number, but it's not flexible
enough (it appends a "(Default %d)" to the prompt). Maybe read-number
should have an optional arg not to add it to the prompt?
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: use-gnus-large-newsgroup-as-default.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1825 bytes --]
diff --git a/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog b/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog
index 65b0431..5f27b39 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog
+++ b/lisp/gnus/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-03-09 Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com>
+
+ * gnus-sum.el (gnus-articles-to-read): Use gnus-large-newsgroup as default
+ number of articles to display.
+ (gnus-articles-to-read): Use pretty names for prompt.
+
2011-03-07 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
* shr.el (shr-table-horizontal-line): Change the defaults for the table
diff --git a/lisp/gnus/gnus-sum.el b/lisp/gnus/gnus-sum.el
index a8786e3..bc572f2 100644
--- a/lisp/gnus/gnus-sum.el
+++ b/lisp/gnus/gnus-sum.el
@@ -5848,13 +5848,13 @@ If SELECT-ARTICLES, only select those articles from GROUP."
(input
(read-string
(format
- "How many articles from %s (%s %d): "
- (gnus-group-decoded-name gnus-newsgroup-name)
- (if initial "max" "default")
- number)
- (if initial
- (cons (number-to-string initial)
- 0)))))
+ "How many articles from %s (available %d, default %d): "
+ (gnus-group-decoded-name (gnus-group-real-name gnus-newsgroup-name))
+ number
+ (or initial gnus-large-newsgroup))
+ nil
+ nil
+ (number-to-string (or initial gnus-large-newsgroup)))))
(if (string-match "^[ \t]*$" input) number input)))
((and (> scored marked) (< scored number)
(> (- scored number) 20))
@@ -5862,7 +5862,7 @@ If SELECT-ARTICLES, only select those articles from GROUP."
(read-string
(format "%s %s (%d scored, %d total): "
"How many articles from"
- (gnus-group-decoded-name group)
+ (gnus-group-decoded-name (gnus-group-real-name gnus-newsgroup-name))
scored number))))
(if (string-match "^[ \t]*$" input)
number input)))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-09 11:07 ` Antoine Levitt
@ 2011-03-15 16:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 22:53 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2011-03-15 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:
> Would this do?
Thanks; applied.
> I'm not too sure about
> gnus-parameter-large-newsgroup-initial, which was used in a really weird
> way before, so I basically set it to override the default value in the
> prompt. Does anyone even use this, anyway? It seems weird to have a
> group-specific setting that isn't customizable in the first place.
Yeah, it's kinda odd...
> Also, the code really should use read-number, but it's not flexible
> enough (it appends a "(Default %d)" to the prompt). Maybe read-number
> should have an optional arg not to add it to the prompt?
Sounds like a good idea.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-15 16:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2011-03-15 22:53 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 22:58 ` Antoine Levitt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2011-03-15 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>> Would this do?
>
> Thanks; applied.
I tweaked it a bit. I found it kinda annoying having to type a number
when entering a group with 300 unread messages, so I reverted it back to
the old behaviour unless you're entering a group with only read messages.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-15 22:53 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2011-03-15 22:58 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-15 23:08 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2011-03-15 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
15/03/11 23:53, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
>>> Would this do?
>>
>> Thanks; applied.
>
> I tweaked it a bit. I found it kinda annoying having to type a number
> when entering a group with 300 unread messages, so I reverted it back to
> the old behaviour unless you're entering a group with only read messages.
Makes sense, although the discrepancy might confuse users. What about
groups with a few ticked messages? Will that trigger the old code?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-15 22:58 ` Antoine Levitt
@ 2011-03-15 23:08 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 23:23 ` Antoine Levitt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2011-03-15 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:
> Makes sense, although the discrepancy might confuse users. What about
> groups with a few ticked messages? Will that trigger the old code?
Yes, I think so.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-15 23:08 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2011-03-15 23:23 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-17 17:50 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2011-03-15 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
16/03/11 00:08, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
> Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Makes sense, although the discrepancy might confuse users. What about
>> groups with a few ticked messages? Will that trigger the old code?
>
> Yes, I think so.
Sorry, my question was imprecise: I meant using C-u RET on a group with
a few ticked messages and lots of read ones: it seems wrong that the
code should behave differently using C-u RET on a group with
unread/ticked messages and using RET on the same group without any
unread/ticked messages.
Also, only-read-p seems like an odd variable name, since we never see
only read messages. Shouldn't it be also-read-p, or (not only-unread-p)?
I'll test it tomorrow and try and think about a nice non-confusing
prompt, which I'm not sure exists :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-15 23:23 ` Antoine Levitt
@ 2011-03-17 17:50 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-17 18:00 ` Antoine Levitt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 2011-03-17 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:
> Sorry, my question was imprecise: I meant using C-u RET on a group with
> a few ticked messages and lots of read ones: it seems wrong that the
> code should behave differently using C-u RET on a group with
> unread/ticked messages and using RET on the same group without any
> unread/ticked messages.
I think it behaves the same way with `C-u RET' on a group with ticked
messages as `RET' behaves on a group with only read messages. I think.
> Also, only-read-p seems like an odd variable name, since we never see
> only read messages. Shouldn't it be also-read-p, or (not only-unread-p)?
Ur... possibly... :-)
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Entering large groups
2011-03-17 17:50 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
@ 2011-03-17 18:00 ` Antoine Levitt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2011-03-17 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
17/03/11 18:50, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
> Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Sorry, my question was imprecise: I meant using C-u RET on a group with
>> a few ticked messages and lots of read ones: it seems wrong that the
>> code should behave differently using C-u RET on a group with
>> unread/ticked messages and using RET on the same group without any
>> unread/ticked messages.
>
> I think it behaves the same way with `C-u RET' on a group with ticked
> messages as `RET' behaves on a group with only read messages. I
> think.
Yeah, I checked it out today and it works very nicely.
I was concerned that the two different prompts might confuse people, but
presumably it now does the right thing most of the time, so that
manually specifying the number of messages you want should be
unnecessary under regular usage.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-17 18:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-01 16:20 Entering large groups Antoine Levitt
2011-03-01 16:31 ` Alberto Luaces
2011-03-02 7:30 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-03-02 8:30 ` Alberto Luaces
2011-03-02 10:32 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-05 11:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-05 11:35 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-05 11:39 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-09 11:07 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-15 16:24 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 22:53 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 22:58 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-15 23:08 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-15 23:23 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-03-17 17:50 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2011-03-17 18:00 ` Antoine Levitt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).